Posted by farrukhrafay on 01 July 2012 | Filed under CNBC Pak
PPP Representative Fawad Chaudhry Exclusive!
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
8304821 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.zemtv.com%2F2012%2F07%2F01%2Fagenda-360fawad-chuadhry-exclusive-1st-july-2012%2FAgenda+360%28Fawad+Chuadhry+Exclusive%21%29+1st+July+20122012-07-01+18%3A08%3A39farrukhrafayhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.zemtv.com%2F%3Fp%3D83048Leave your comment
Is Fawad Ch. receiving tips on his blackberry. If you notice his programs in last few weeks, everytime when other participants are speaking he’s constantly reading something on his cell phone. Considering his mental, intellect level I would not be surprised if he’s taking tips from someone outside. Even if he isnt, sadly he has no discussion ethics, when you’re in a meeting it sounds such annoying that you keep reading messages on the cell.
360 degree is = Zero also – What this programme iis all about.
One lawyer sandwiched between two watch dogs, who were totally ignorant of law and constitution and failed to lay hand on any provision of constitution regarding their unconditional right right of interpretation.
The fat Anchor even donot know what the international media, commenting upon our judiciary. A journalist must know law first before commenting it. What to talk of law they donot know what the international media is saying on this judicial coup.
- The Pakistan Supreme court flouted all cannons of constitutional jurisprudence. Indian Express by Justice Katju
- Sling arm chief justice of Pakistan sacked Gillani ( Reuters)
- Military backed judiciary torpedoed Coming PM ( Gaurdian London)
- judicial Coup in Pakistan Daily telegraph
Biased and unprepared anchors to read following comments to set their degrees (360) right, passed by justice of Indian Supreme court in response to Pakistan Barristers vital questins raised.
Justice Katju’s reply to Barrister Rizwan Ahmad:
Dear Barraister Rizwan,
I have seen your comment on my article,and would like to respond.
You have basically raised two issues in support of the action taken by your Supreme Court:
(1) Since the National Reconciliation Ordinance has been declared unconstitutional by the Court, the pre NRO cases against Mr. Zardari can go on.
(2) The Prime Minister is disqualified from becoming a member of Parliament because of section 63(1)(g) of your Constitution.
My reply is as follows:
As regards (1), the cases against Mr. Zardari cannot go on, at least as long he is the President, because section 248(2) of the Constitution specifically says that not only no criminal case can be instituted against the President, but also that none can be continued. So even if a criminal case was pending against him when he became the President it cannot continue so long as he is the President. The wording of the section is clear and unambiguous, and it is a settled principle of interpretation that when the language of a provision is clear then the only rule of interpretation which applies is the literal rule.
As regards(2), section 63(1)(g) of the Constitution, to which you have referred says, inter alia, that a person shall be disqualified from being elected and from being a member of Parliament if he has been convicted by a competent Court for acting in any manner which defames or brings into ridicule the judiciary.
I need not go into the question as to which authority has the power to disqualify a person under this provision. I am raising a much more fundamental question.
When Mr. Gilani said that the Court cannot give directions which directly or indirectly violate section 248(2) of the Constitution did he defame or ridicule the judiciary? I think he raised a very valid objection and this surely does not amount to defaming or ridiculing the Court. Had he said that the Supreme Court was acting mala fide or for some ulterior or corrupt motive that would certainly be defaming the Court, and had he said that the Court was acting stupidlly that would amount to ridiculing the Court.
But Mr. Gilani only raised a Constitutional question of great importance. Does this amount to defaming or ridiculing the Court?
In my opinion, every conviction for contempt of court cannot result in disqualification under section 63(1)(g). One has to see the precise act which has resulted in the conviction.
Hence both the objections raised by you are unsustainable.
As I have already mentioned earlier, your Chief Justice, and also many of his companion Judges are showing utter lack of self restraint expected of a superior Court, and for a long time they have been playing to the galleries. Whether they have some hidden agenda for behaving like this I cannot say, but if this trend continues I am afraid it will wreck the Constitution, and then the results will be disastrous.
Regards
Justice Katju
One eyed anchors and blind followers to spare few minutes and read it to clear their concept.
A man who is solicitor of a son of most corrupt person in Pakistan on National TV defending the PPP who only have knowledge of law (that is he does have that qualification), you are asking him political questions? Is he the next prime minister of Pakistan? I stopped watching after the first part, what a waste of my time. This is the last time I am watching your show. Just a request to all Talk shows, please do not make it a fish market where you can not even hear what anyone is saying? Give them time and turn to reply and ask question in turns in humanly manners. Is that possible? Some will say NOT IN PAKISTAN!
PLEASE DON,T CALL NOORA LEAUGE,,,PTI SA ZIADA PP KO TUF TIME DIA HA PML-N NA,,,
NRO K KHILAAF KON KHARA HUA OR SC MAIN GIA PML-N,,,
RENTAL POWER PER SC MAIN KON GIA PML-N,,,
MAMO GATE PER KON GIA,,,PML-N,,,
SC K LIA LONG MARCH KIS NA KIA,,,
IS K ILAWA BOHET SARI JAGOON PER TUF TIME DIA PPP KO,,,20 TERMEEM KERWAYI,,,
ELECTION COMMISSION K LIA OR NAGRAN HAKOOMET K LIA,,,
AGER PML-N PARLIMENT MAIN NA HOTI TO AJ TEK AISA AISA QANOON BEN GIA HOTA,,,PPP,,ANP,,OR MQM KI WAJAH SA JIS SA MULAK KO TOOR DIA JATA,,,,
PTI JITNI MERZI TENQEED KARA KIOONKA UN KO B VOTE LAINA HA,,,PUNJAB SA,,,MAGER IS SIYSET SA KUCH NAHI MILA GA,,,
YA MUTHADA QATIL MOVEMENT KI AJEEB AJEEB POLICIES HAIN,,,HAQQANI JAISA,,,REHMAN MALIK JAISA PEHLA KEM THA,,,PHIR YA JO QANOON K MATABIQ MULAK KO TABAH KARAIN GA,,,,SHAME ON YOU,,,WADAROON K KHILAAF INQALAB LA KER AYAIN GA,,,WADAROON KO PICHLA 5 SAAL SA SHARA DA RAHA HAIN,,,,
JEB SA YA MEDIA AZAD HUA HA,,,2002 K BAAD PAKISTAN KA HALAT KHARAB KERNA MAIN OR ISLAM KO BEDNAA KERNA MAIN IS K BOHET BARA HATH HA,,,IK PLAN K TEHT YA KIA GIA THA,,,MANA 3 CHANNELS PER TEMPLE MENDER K PROGRAM DEKHA HA,,,JAHAN RATS KI PUJA KERTA HAIN INDIA MAIN,,,MAGER IS MEDIA KO SHREM NAHI AITI K HUM APNA AAP KO MUSLIM KEHTA HAIN,,,OR ISLAM K LIA KITNA PROGRAM KERTA HAIN IN NEWS CHANNELS PER OR ISLAM K BARA MAIN,,,,
JIS QURAN OR NABI SAW KI WAJAHA SA HAMAIN ZINDGI K MAQSAD K PTA CHALA US K LIA YA MEDIA WALA KITNI AWAZ UTHATA HAIN,,,JIS KI WJAHA SA FAISLA HONA HA JANNAT MILA GI ya DOZEKH MILA GI,,,JIN KI MAAN K CHELNA SA ALLAH NA FERMAYA MAIN TUMHAIN DUNIYA B DOON GA OR AKHRTE B,,,US KATAB K LIA OR US NABI SAW K BARA MAIN YA KITNA PROGRAM KERTA HAIN,,,
ULTA PROPOGANDA KERTA HAIN,,,SHAME SHAME SHAME,,,AISA JOURNLIST PER OR COLUMIST PER,,,JO NA KHUD AMAL KERTA HAIN NA LOGOON KO US KI TARGEEB DETA HAIN,,,YA MEDIA, CIVIL SOCIETY KIOON AWAZ NAHI UTHATI JO SAHI ILAM HA QURAN K OR HADEES K,,,US KO HAMARA SCHOOLS SA KIOON KHATEM KIA JA RAHA HA,,KIOON ISLAMIYAT PRIMARY SA LA KER UNIVERSITY TEK MUST KIOON NAHI HA,,,PRIVATE SCHOOL SA KIOON IS KO NIKAAL DIA GIA HA,,,MAGER KOIE NAHI UTAHAY GA KIOON KA AGENDA HAIN SEB K PASS,,,IS MULAK KO BERBAAD KERNA K LIA,,,LANNAT HO AISI CIVIL SOCIETY PER OR MEDIA PER JIS NA LOGOON KO GUMRAH KIA,,,SEB SA ZIADA CORRUPTION ISI MEDIA MAIN HI HA,,,YA SAFMA K AGENDA HA,,,PAKISTAN KO JEB TORA GIA TO US TIME BANGLADESH K PRINT MEDIA MAIN ISI TARAH WEST PAKISTAN K KHILAAF COMPAIGN CHALIE GIE THI,,,JIS TARAH AB KABHI YA BATAY JATA HA PAKISTAN TOOT JIA GA,,,KABHI TWO NATION THEORY K KOIE JAWAZ NAHI HA,,,KABHI ARMY K KHILAF PROPOGANDA,,,KABHI TEACHERS K KHILAAF,,,KABHI MADRASOON K KHILAAF,,,KABHI SC K KHILAAF,,,ALLAH INSHALLAH HAMARA MULAK KI HAFAZET KARA GA,,,
PRESS CLUBS MAIN KIA HOTA HA,,,SARA AAM SHARAB PEE JATI HA,,,
One can get to hear quality discussion at a bus-stop than this show. At least you should take yourselves serious if you want improve your ratings/quality of show.
DUNYA IS BEKHAIRAT MUFAD PRAST MASALI PER LANATEIN BHEJATI HAI MAGAR IS LANATI KIRDAR KO SHARAM ANHI AATI PATA NAHI US KON SE BEKHAIRAT MITTI LAGI HUIE HAI.
Fawad choudhry was a chumcha of musharaf now he is a chumcha of pp but these 2 anchors are atupid they are not allowing other person to talk anchor's jot is to ask a question and listen other person not to talk if we share time these 2 anchors took 2third time when the guest was given less time that is not fair, if tomorrow they call imran khan and act same behavour supporters of imran khan will break thair televisions
SHAME ON ENCOR PERSON KUN AP IS KO BULATE HO JO KABHI COUNCLER B NHI BAN SAKTA …AP US KO INVITE KUN KERTE HO….?KIA KOI AOR SERIOUS BANDA NHI MILTA…..?YEH TO WHIT KO BLACK AOR BLACK KO WHITE KEHTA HE..
This son of a gun .. Fawad Chaudry … is a paendo with least of education .. Kothay da puthar … is ki shakal daeko .. Rotay juon ho iski shakal he aisey hi hai
he is no different than Imran, Marvi Memon, Javed Hashmi, Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Tariq azeem, Nawaz Sahreef, Kashmala Tariq or any ppl who have changed the parties.
Is Fawad Ch. receiving tips on his blackberry. If you notice his programs in last few weeks, everytime when other participants are speaking he’s constantly reading something on his cell phone. Considering his mental, intellect level I would not be surprised if he’s taking tips from someone outside. Even if he isnt, sadly he has no discussion ethics, when you’re in a meeting it sounds such annoying that you keep reading messages on the cell.
Fawad Ch. yaani Muffad Ch. ……………… speaks for money…..he does not care right or wrong …………….shame shame. After next election he will be nowhere !
360 degree is = Zero also – What this programme iis all about.
One lawyer sandwiched between two watch dogs, who were totally ignorant of law and constitution and failed to lay hand on any provision of constitution regarding their unconditional right right of interpretation.
The fat Anchor even donot know what the international media, commenting upon our judiciary. A journalist must know law first before commenting it. What to talk of law they donot know what the international media is saying on this judicial coup.
- The Pakistan Supreme court flouted all cannons of constitutional jurisprudence. Indian Express by Justice Katju
- Sling arm chief justice of Pakistan sacked Gillani ( Reuters)
- Military backed judiciary torpedoed Coming PM ( Gaurdian London)
- judicial Coup in Pakistan Daily telegraph
Biased and unprepared anchors to read following comments to set their degrees (360) right, passed by justice of Indian Supreme court in response to Pakistan Barristers vital questins raised.
Justice Katju’s reply to Barrister Rizwan Ahmad:
Dear Barraister Rizwan,
I have seen your comment on my article,and would like to respond.
You have basically raised two issues in support of the action taken by your Supreme Court:
(1) Since the National Reconciliation Ordinance has been declared unconstitutional by the Court, the pre NRO cases against Mr. Zardari can go on.
(2) The Prime Minister is disqualified from becoming a member of Parliament because of section 63(1)(g) of your Constitution.
My reply is as follows:
As regards (1), the cases against Mr. Zardari cannot go on, at least as long he is the President, because section 248(2) of the Constitution specifically says that not only no criminal case can be instituted against the President, but also that none can be continued. So even if a criminal case was pending against him when he became the President it cannot continue so long as he is the President. The wording of the section is clear and unambiguous, and it is a settled principle of interpretation that when the language of a provision is clear then the only rule of interpretation which applies is the literal rule.
As regards(2), section 63(1)(g) of the Constitution, to which you have referred says, inter alia, that a person shall be disqualified from being elected and from being a member of Parliament if he has been convicted by a competent Court for acting in any manner which defames or brings into ridicule the judiciary.
I need not go into the question as to which authority has the power to disqualify a person under this provision. I am raising a much more fundamental question.
When Mr. Gilani said that the Court cannot give directions which directly or indirectly violate section 248(2) of the Constitution did he defame or ridicule the judiciary? I think he raised a very valid objection and this surely does not amount to defaming or ridiculing the Court. Had he said that the Supreme Court was acting mala fide or for some ulterior or corrupt motive that would certainly be defaming the Court, and had he said that the Court was acting stupidlly that would amount to ridiculing the Court.
But Mr. Gilani only raised a Constitutional question of great importance. Does this amount to defaming or ridiculing the Court?
In my opinion, every conviction for contempt of court cannot result in disqualification under section 63(1)(g). One has to see the precise act which has resulted in the conviction.
Hence both the objections raised by you are unsustainable.
As I have already mentioned earlier, your Chief Justice, and also many of his companion Judges are showing utter lack of self restraint expected of a superior Court, and for a long time they have been playing to the galleries. Whether they have some hidden agenda for behaving like this I cannot say, but if this trend continues I am afraid it will wreck the Constitution, and then the results will be disastrous.
Regards
Justice Katju
One eyed anchors and blind followers to spare few minutes and read it to clear their concept.
A man who is solicitor of a son of most corrupt person in Pakistan on National TV defending the PPP who only have knowledge of law (that is he does have that qualification), you are asking him political questions? Is he the next prime minister of Pakistan? I stopped watching after the first part, what a waste of my time. This is the last time I am watching your show. Just a request to all Talk shows, please do not make it a fish market where you can not even hear what anyone is saying? Give them time and turn to reply and ask question in turns in humanly manners. Is that possible? Some will say NOT IN PAKISTAN!
PLEASE DON,T CALL NOORA LEAUGE,,,PTI SA ZIADA PP KO TUF TIME DIA HA PML-N NA,,,
NRO K KHILAAF KON KHARA HUA OR SC MAIN GIA PML-N,,,
RENTAL POWER PER SC MAIN KON GIA PML-N,,,
MAMO GATE PER KON GIA,,,PML-N,,,
SC K LIA LONG MARCH KIS NA KIA,,,
IS K ILAWA BOHET SARI JAGOON PER TUF TIME DIA PPP KO,,,20 TERMEEM KERWAYI,,,
ELECTION COMMISSION K LIA OR NAGRAN HAKOOMET K LIA,,,
AGER PML-N PARLIMENT MAIN NA HOTI TO AJ TEK AISA AISA QANOON BEN GIA HOTA,,,PPP,,ANP,,OR MQM KI WAJAH SA JIS SA MULAK KO TOOR DIA JATA,,,,
PTI JITNI MERZI TENQEED KARA KIOONKA UN KO B VOTE LAINA HA,,,PUNJAB SA,,,MAGER IS SIYSET SA KUCH NAHI MILA GA,,,
YA MUTHADA QATIL MOVEMENT KI AJEEB AJEEB POLICIES HAIN,,,HAQQANI JAISA,,,REHMAN MALIK JAISA PEHLA KEM THA,,,PHIR YA JO QANOON K MATABIQ MULAK KO TABAH KARAIN GA,,,,SHAME ON YOU,,,WADAROON K KHILAAF INQALAB LA KER AYAIN GA,,,WADAROON KO PICHLA 5 SAAL SA SHARA DA RAHA HAIN,,,,
JEB SA YA MEDIA AZAD HUA HA,,,2002 K BAAD PAKISTAN KA HALAT KHARAB KERNA MAIN OR ISLAM KO BEDNAA KERNA MAIN IS K BOHET BARA HATH HA,,,IK PLAN K TEHT YA KIA GIA THA,,,MANA 3 CHANNELS PER TEMPLE MENDER K PROGRAM DEKHA HA,,,JAHAN RATS KI PUJA KERTA HAIN INDIA MAIN,,,MAGER IS MEDIA KO SHREM NAHI AITI K HUM APNA AAP KO MUSLIM KEHTA HAIN,,,OR ISLAM K LIA KITNA PROGRAM KERTA HAIN IN NEWS CHANNELS PER OR ISLAM K BARA MAIN,,,,
JIS QURAN OR NABI SAW KI WAJAHA SA HAMAIN ZINDGI K MAQSAD K PTA CHALA US K LIA YA MEDIA WALA KITNI AWAZ UTHATA HAIN,,,JIS KI WJAHA SA FAISLA HONA HA JANNAT MILA GI ya DOZEKH MILA GI,,,JIN KI MAAN K CHELNA SA ALLAH NA FERMAYA MAIN TUMHAIN DUNIYA B DOON GA OR AKHRTE B,,,US KATAB K LIA OR US NABI SAW K BARA MAIN YA KITNA PROGRAM KERTA HAIN,,,
ULTA PROPOGANDA KERTA HAIN,,,SHAME SHAME SHAME,,,AISA JOURNLIST PER OR COLUMIST PER,,,JO NA KHUD AMAL KERTA HAIN NA LOGOON KO US KI TARGEEB DETA HAIN,,,YA MEDIA, CIVIL SOCIETY KIOON AWAZ NAHI UTHATI JO SAHI ILAM HA QURAN K OR HADEES K,,,US KO HAMARA SCHOOLS SA KIOON KHATEM KIA JA RAHA HA,,KIOON ISLAMIYAT PRIMARY SA LA KER UNIVERSITY TEK MUST KIOON NAHI HA,,,PRIVATE SCHOOL SA KIOON IS KO NIKAAL DIA GIA HA,,,MAGER KOIE NAHI UTAHAY GA KIOON KA AGENDA HAIN SEB K PASS,,,IS MULAK KO BERBAAD KERNA K LIA,,,LANNAT HO AISI CIVIL SOCIETY PER OR MEDIA PER JIS NA LOGOON KO GUMRAH KIA,,,SEB SA ZIADA CORRUPTION ISI MEDIA MAIN HI HA,,,YA SAFMA K AGENDA HA,,,PAKISTAN KO JEB TORA GIA TO US TIME BANGLADESH K PRINT MEDIA MAIN ISI TARAH WEST PAKISTAN K KHILAAF COMPAIGN CHALIE GIE THI,,,JIS TARAH AB KABHI YA BATAY JATA HA PAKISTAN TOOT JIA GA,,,KABHI TWO NATION THEORY K KOIE JAWAZ NAHI HA,,,KABHI ARMY K KHILAF PROPOGANDA,,,KABHI TEACHERS K KHILAAF,,,KABHI MADRASOON K KHILAAF,,,KABHI SC K KHILAAF,,,ALLAH INSHALLAH HAMARA MULAK KI HAFAZET KARA GA,,,
PRESS CLUBS MAIN KIA HOTA HA,,,SARA AAM SHARAB PEE JATI HA,,,
What a shit man to do discussion with.I don't want to hear this shit man with a shity face.
I feel pity of these two young men interviewing this SHIT…
One can get to hear quality discussion at a bus-stop than this show. At least you should take yourselves serious if you want improve your ratings/quality of show.
aaaaahhhh main samjhta tha keh keh sub se bakwaas anchor jasmine manzoor aur kuch aur khawateen anchors hi hoti hain magar …. main ghalat thaaa….
Jaisa CNBC chanel hai waisay hi uskay anchors hain…
I hate this person, Fawad Chaudhry, and wish he should be banned by Pakistani media to appear before the public. He talks rubbbish.
Laanat Os Maa Paar Jis Naa Fawad Chaudhry Ko Paida Kiyaa.
tahirmahmood9 ,
GET YOUR HEAD CHECKED, GO TO A SHRINK, QUICK.
.
DUNYA IS BEKHAIRAT MUFAD PRAST MASALI PER LANATEIN BHEJATI HAI MAGAR IS LANATI KIRDAR KO SHARAM ANHI AATI PATA NAHI US KON SE BEKHAIRAT MITTI LAGI HUIE HAI.
Fawad choudhry was a chumcha of musharaf now he is a chumcha of pp but these 2 anchors are atupid they are not allowing other person to talk anchor's jot is to ask a question and listen other person not to talk if we share time these 2 anchors took 2third time when the guest was given less time that is not fair, if tomorrow they call imran khan and act same behavour supporters of imran khan will break thair televisions
let him come on these programmes. He does well to put people off PPP(Z)
ppp k pass koi aor jeyala nahe k bandar waly mo fawad ko agy kia howa hy
SHIT PROGRAMME WITH SHIT 3 PEOPLE
SHAME ON ENCOR PERSON KUN AP IS KO BULATE HO JO KABHI COUNCLER B NHI BAN SAKTA …AP US KO INVITE KUN KERTE HO….?KIA KOI AOR SERIOUS BANDA NHI MILTA…..?YEH TO WHIT KO BLACK AOR BLACK KO WHITE KEHTA HE..
Who is this 'Khoti pa puttar' – Fawad Chaudhry
One day he is with Pervaiz Musharraf and now he is in Zardari Camp. Waisi iski bhi 'umer dekh – Te gallan wekh'
Very pro Zardari and behaves like a truly faithul dog.
From: Bawa- PKPolitics.
This son of a gun .. Fawad Chaudry … is a paendo with least of education .. Kothay da puthar … is ki shakal daeko .. Rotay juon ho iski shakal he aisey hi hai
he is no different than Imran, Marvi Memon, Javed Hashmi, Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Tariq azeem, Nawaz Sahreef, Kashmala Tariq or any ppl who have changed the parties.